Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8674 13
Original file (NR8674 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
GEREN DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
fine \\ 3X
RSET) Fe - ROARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

} 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

     

DIC
Docket No. NR8674-13
16 ge 14

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

15 September 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11
dated 7 August 2014, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

   

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Enclosure: HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dtd 7 Aug 14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0529 14

    Original file (NR0529 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. In addition, the Board on furnished by HoMc memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 9 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4734 13

    Original file (NR4734 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6707 14

    Original file (NR6707 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6114 14

    Original file (NR6114 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary materia considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR6114-14 a correction of an official naval he applicant to demonstrate the existence of Consequently, when applying for record, the burden is on t probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00028-09

    Original file (00028-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 Jume 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05689 11

    Original file (05689 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2012. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 5000 RFF-DOSS02 dated 21 Jun 12 and HOMC Memo 1650 MMMA-3 dated 13 Oct 11, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12254 14

    Original file (NR12254 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 wh ~? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of travel expenses. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on February 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12262 14

    Original file (NR12262 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board ‘requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of travel expenses. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12229 14

    Original file (NR12229 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of travel expenses. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09297-04

    Original file (09297-04.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. We have been requested to provide an advisory opinion on application requesting payment of accrued leave prior to his General Courts Martial.